situation: some feel we need titles/ranks since gamers have some strange fixation on them. i believe most of us don't care about a rank or a title, but younger folks do. the ranks now are based off of who i see on a daily basis and how they feel about being part of the clan, as must seem obvious to those who have bothered to browse over it.
as regards to what the ranks are, i have another set based more off of what dark's 12 year old mind may have come up with. i know a lot of younger ones may not understand why someone would be called a 'botmaster'
i know cetnik feels there are too many ranks.
basically, what there is to discuss is this:
1. how many ranks would people enjoy seeing
2. thoughts on theme (old ewr, feudal, etc)
most of us feel were on an equal basis anyways (we see no rank when we see one another <3 ), but it *will* foster a better environment for gamers. especially when sc2 comes out.
some ideas:
1. Leader >> Realmer >> Cadre >> Guild Master >> Lictor >> Apprentice
2. Fedual (you've seen it)
3. Member: if youre good enough to be in the clan, youre a 'member'
4. the First >> Realmer >> Myths >> Realm Legends >> Slayers >> Hunters >> Sleepers
thoughts, opinions? just dont be douchey about it. im sleepy of complaints.
I was thinking something more like...
Leaders >> Realmers >> High Council >> *rank here* >> *rank here* >> Dweller (non-member users)
UPDATED
I like the feudal ranks, but I suppose we could drop a few.
Emperor - Arch-Duke - Duke - Baron - Knight - Peasant
Peasant is to be used on the forum only. It's main purpose is for outsiders who have registered.
I see Cet has replied while I was typing this, SMF rocks. I forgot about Council, which is good to have as it gives a false sense of leadership :).
So my reprise:
Emperor - Arch-Duke - Council/Duke - Duke - Baron - Knight - Peasant
those are too dull and boring
we need to keep the old school EwR feeling and have a sense of order of power with the names
Quote from: FRoG on April 21, 2008, 12:17:22 AM
situation: some feel we need titles/ranks since gamers have some strange fixation on them. i believe most of us don't care about a rank or a title, but younger folks do. the ranks now are based off of who i see on a daily basis and how they feel about being part of the clan, as must seem obvious to those who have bothered to browse over it.
as regards to what the ranks are, i have another set based more off of what dark's 12 year old mind may have come up with. i know a lot of younger ones may not understand why someone would be called a 'botmaster'
i know cetnik feels there are too many ranks.
basically, what there is to discuss is this:
1. how many ranks would people enjoy seeing
2. thoughts on theme (old ewr, feudal, etc)
most of us feel were on an equal basis anyways (we see no rank when we see one another <3 ), but it *will* foster a better environment for gamers. especially when sc2 comes out.
some ideas:
1. Leader >> Realmer >> Cadre >> Guild Master >> Lictor >> Apprentice
2. Fedual (you've seen it)
3. Member: if youre good enough to be in the clan, youre a 'member'
4. the First >> Realmer >> Myths >> Realm Legends >> Slayers >> Hunters >> Sleepers
thoughts, opinions? just dont be douchey about it. im sleepy of complaints.
I'm feelin the #4 rank list.. All of it actually minus the Realm Legends.. that one could be replaced. Lovin the realmer and myth rank tho. good shit frog.
Quote from: CetniK on April 21, 2008, 09:18:50 AM
I was thinking something more like...
Leaders >> Realmers >> High Council >> *rank here* >> *rank here* >> Dweller (non-member users)
UPDATED
<-- doesn't care
Quote from: KiLLa on April 21, 2008, 08:51:38 PM
<-- doesn't care
<-- DOESN'T CARE THAT YOU DON'T CARE
Grand Masters >> Sentinels >> Consulars >> Guardians >> Gatemasters >> Lords >> High//Senior Generals >> Warriors >> Initiates
LOLS EVERBREAD THATS SO HOMO
I thought that was the point of the thread?
Who can make up the most homo titles.
So far, I'm winning.
Quote from: EverBlue on April 21, 2008, 11:04:04 PM
I thought that was the point of the thread?
Who can make up the most homo titles.
So far, I'm winning.
LOLS'D
that wasn't the point :[
Shut up. I win. I demand a prize.
LEETSKEET PRIZE GRANTED
replace realm legends with sentinals and you got yourself an awesome ranks list..
Quote from: FiReWaLL on April 22, 2008, 03:35:07 AM
replace realm legends with sentinals and you got yourself an awesome ranks list..
EW????
ok i need to see zerg's thoughts on this
the First >> Realmers >> the 9 Myths >> Wraths >> Slayers >> Sleepers >> Dweller (non-EwR forum name)
high council seats = 6 (any rank allowed)
myths could be a select core who may choose to pass on their title as they float to realmership
god damn i'm so shleepy :[
Looks good too..
oh i just read your dealy, do you want to use sentinel
Quote from: FRoG on April 22, 2008, 01:29:32 PM
oh i just read your dealy, do you want to use sentinel
Yeah dude, thats 100 with me, i'm cool with it all.
REALMERSHIP LOLLOLOLOLS
LOLOLLOLOLOSLSSS
LOLSAURITIS HAS TAKEN OVER
LOLLERCAUST
FAILARAMA
HOLD THE LMAONAISE ON MY ROLFBURGER PLZKTHX
Did we ever decide on these? We're all in our mid-20s now and don't need an assortment of ranks like a bunch of kids. The clan is pretty much self-run by every member, but some kind of basic ranking system is still in order.
Leaders
V
High Council
V
Members/Elite Warriors
In my opinion, this will simplify everything and will skip the process of needing to be super-creative.
finally after 3 years we can decide on our clan ranks. good to hear!
All in favour? Aye! Motion passed! *Bangs gavel.*
all i want for christmas is an imaginary rank!
Quote from: TyLeR on November 15, 2011, 12:07:09 PM
all i want for christmas is an imaginary rank!
You're already a private IRL
IRL ranks are a little cooler
The ORIGINAL ranks of EwR are as follows from descending order:
Leader(s)/Realmers(each leader had one (1) realmer)/High Council/Botmaster(s)/Warriors
The rest is garbage. NOW that's keeping it OLD SKEWL, GUISE!